Goto

Collaborating Authors

 poker bot


A Survey on Game Theory Optimal Poker

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Poker is in the family of imperfect information games unlike other games such as chess, connect four, etc which are perfect information game instead. While many perfect information games have been solved, no non-trivial imperfect information game has been solved to date. This makes poker a great test bed for Artificial Intelligence research. In this paper we firstly compare Game theory optimal poker to Exploitative poker. Secondly, we discuss the intricacies of abstraction techniques, betting models, and specific strategies employed by successful poker bots like Tartanian[1] and Pluribus[6]. Thirdly, we also explore 2-player vs multi-player games and the limitations that come when playing with more players. Finally, this paper discusses the role of machine learning and theoretical approaches in developing winning strategies and suggests future directions for this rapidly evolving field.


PokerBot: Create your poker AI bot in Python - Data Blogger

#artificialintelligence

In this tutorial, you will learn step-by-step how to implement a poker bot in Python. First, we need an engine in which we can simulate our poker bot. It also has a GUI available which can graphically display a game. Both the engine and the GUI have excellent tutorials on their GitHub pages in how to use them. The choice for the engine (and/or the GUI) is arbitrary and can be replaced by any engine (and/or GUI) you like.


A Poker-Playing Robot Goes to Work for the Pentagon

#artificialintelligence

In 2017, a poker bot called Libratus made headlines when it roundly defeated four top human players at no-limit Texas Hold'Em. Now, Libratus' technology is being adapted to take on opponents of a different kind--in service of the US military. Libratus--Latin for balanced--was created by researchers from Carnegie Mellon University to test ideas for automated decisionmaking based on game theory. Early last year, the professor who led the project, Tuomas Sandholm, founded a startup called Strategy Robot to adapt his lab's game-playing technology for government use, such as in war games and simulations used to explore military strategy and planning. Late in August, public records show, the company received a two-year contract of up to $10 million with the US Army.


A Poker-Playing Robot Goes to Work for the Pentagon

WIRED

In 2017, a poker bot called Libratus made headlines when it roundly defeated four top human players at no-limit Texas Hold'Em. Now, Libratus's technology is being adapted to take on opponents of a different kind--in service of the US military. Libratus--Latin for balanced--was created by researchers from Carnegie Mellon University to test ideas for automated decision-making based on game theory. Early last year, the professor who led the project, Tuomas Sandholm, founded a startup called Strategy Robot to adapt his lab's game-playing technology for government use, such as in wargames and simulations used to explore military strategy and planning. Late in August, public records show, the company received a two-year contract of up to $10 million with the US Army.


PokerBot: Create your poker AI bot in Python

@machinelearnbot

In this tutorial, you will learn step-by-step how to implement a poker bot in Python. First, we need an engine in which we can simulate our poker bot. It also has a GUI available which can graphically display a game. Both the engine and the GUI have excellent tutorials on their GitHub pages in how to use them. The choice for the engine (and/or the GUI) is arbitrary and can be replaced by any engine (and/or GUI) you like.


Poker bots raise the stakes for human players

AITopics Original Links

A DOZEN men wearing dark green T-shirts and wide grins whoop, shake hands and high-five, while another group in navy blue baseball caps do their best to look magnanimous in defeat in front of several dozen onlookers. In most respects this was a low-key event, but the scene, at a nondescript booth of a Las Vegas convention centre in July this year, may to be a pivotal moment for the development of artificial intelligence. That's because at the Gaming Life Expo at the Rio All-Suite Hotel & Casino, a computer program called Polaris became the first to beat a team of world-class poker players, each of whom had previously won more than $1 million. Some may see the victory as the latest dismal step in silicon's march towards superiority over humans. Others will view it as an exciting move forward in artificial intelligence โ€“ a foretaste of the sophisticated tasks computers should be able to perform for us in years to come.


After day one, AI is crushing humanity at poker

#artificialintelligence

The first day of the Brains vs. AI poker tournament is in the books, and the Libratus bot from Carnegie Mellon University emerged as the clear winner, collecting $81,716 to the humans $7,228. Both the players and Libratus' creators cautioned that it was still too early to make a judgement call about who might win the 20-day tournament. But it's clear that this year's AI has made some major improvements on the 2015 system, Claudico, which ended up losing to humanity. "I felt like Libratus is playing a lot better than Claudico did in the previous challenge," wrote Jason Les, one of the four poker pros, in an email to The Verge. "Preflop, it is using a widely mixed strategy," of small bets, calls, and very large wagers.


Poker may be the latest game to fold against artificial intelligence

#artificialintelligence

In a landmark achievement for artificial intelligence, a poker bot developed by researchers in Canada and the Czech Republic has defeated several professional players in one-on-one games of no-limit Texas hold'em poker. Perhaps most interestingly, the academics behind the work say their program overcame its human opponents by using an approximation approach that they compare to "gut feeling." "If correct, this is indeed a significant advance in game-playing AI," says Michael Wellman, a professor at the University of Michigan who specializes in game theory and AI. "First, it achieves a major milestone (beating poker professionals) in a game of prominent interest. Second, it brings together several novel ideas, which together support an exciting approach for imperfect-information games."


These poker-playing robots can bluff better than humans

#artificialintelligence

When it comes to understanding intelligence, the greatest challenge out there is not a Rubik's Cube, or chess, or even Go. These games are difficult in the sense that there are often many options, but they are still transparent: nothing is hidden; every bit of information is in front of you. The main obstacle is converting this perfect information into a strategy. There is a fixed set of rules out there, and if a computer can find them, it will achieve the optimal result in every game. When Garry Kasparov lost to IBM's Deep Blue chess computer in 1997, he lamented this approach.


How big data and poker-playing bots are blurring the line between man and machine

#artificialintelligence

In his new book, The Perfect Bet: How Science and Math Are Taking the Luck Out of Gambling, Adam Kucharski details how trying to understand dice games led one mathematician to develop probability theory, how one of the first wearable computers was designed to covertly predict the fall of a roulette ball, and how poker-playing bots are advancing more quickly than we think. As he shows, science, mathematics, and gambling have long been intertwined, and thanks to advances in big data and machine learning, our sense of what's predictable is growing, crowding out the spaces formerly ruled by chance. At the same time, though, we're letting more of our lives be influenced by algorithms, bits of code whose effects are beyond our full understanding. As in so many other areas, the creations are outpacing their creators. In the lightly edited interview below, Kucharski explains how we got here, what poker-playing bots can show us about being human, and what comes next. In the book you call gamblers the godfathers of probability theory, noting that it's a newer area of mathematics than we might expect.